- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Niki posted a video link about zodiacal precession in the Sidereal vs. Tropical thread. In it, it demonstrates how the earth isn’t actually a perfect sphere, but kind of fatter at the equator. Except… it really isn’t.
The equatorial diameter is 7,926 miles, while the polar diameter is 7,900 miles. That’s only a 26-mile difference.
If you’re standing on the equator, the earth is whipping around at 1,038 mph. But when you’re standing on the north or south pole, it’s spinning so slowly, that it will take you 24 hours to make a full revolution.
Supposedly, the earth is mostly molten rock—a liquid. So, if the earth is a big ball of goo that barely rotates at the top and bottom, but is moving at Mach 1.35 at the equator, it should DEFINITELY be a little wider in the middle–as should all planets and stars!
We’re told that gravity is so ridiculously powerful that it’s just holding the earth and all other planetary bodies into neat little spheres—that it’s literally keeping mountains and seas from being ripped off the earth’s surface… yet butterflies can pull themselves away from it like it’s nothing?
Keep in mind that to this day, nobody knows what gravity is. We can see and predict its effects, but we don’t have any idea what it is (particle, wave, etc.).
But what if gravity is an emergent effect of electromagnetic energy? What if in the case of celestial bodies, gravity is just the net attractive force between to oppositely charged particles? In other words, what if space is negatively charged and a planet is positively charged?
This would account for the spherical shapes of planets and stars throughout the universe. And it would account for the electric discharge trails seen behind comets as they approach the sun through its oppositely charted EM field, and why interactions between planetary bodies (like Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter) result in massive bursts of light (electrical discharge).
It would also explain the Valles Marineras on Mars, which geologists can’t account for—but CAN be replicated in the lab via electrical scouring/discharge.
I have a theory that the Electric Universe Model ties into astrology, but I’m still working out the details. Anway, I’d love to hear other people’s takes on it.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
